Bahasa, Agama, dan Konstruksi Budaya Hijau dalam Komunitas Ekonomi Lokal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63462/4137qd86Keywords:
religious language; green culture; local economy; environmental ethics; symbolic constructionAbstract
This study explores the role of language and religion in constructing a green culture within local economic communities. Environmental degradation and economic vulnerability require approaches that integrate ecological values with culturally embedded meaning systems. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis involving local economic actors, religious leaders, and community figures. The findings reveal that religious language frames nature as a moral and spiritual trust, while religious teachings provide normative boundaries for economic activities. These discursive and ethical processes contribute to the formation of a green culture that influences production practices, marketing strategies, and consumption patterns. Green culture is manifested through restrained resource use, symbolic differentiation of products based on religious and ecological identity, and increased social trust toward environmentally responsible businesses. However, market pressures and structural economic constraints limit the consistent application of green values in practice. The novelty of this study lies in its integrative analysis of religious language and green culture as symbolic mechanisms that mediate between environmental ethics and local economic practices. The findings contribute to interdisciplinary discussions on language, religion, and sustainable local development by highlighting the importance of meaning-making processes in shaping ecological economic behavior.
Downloads
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik lingkungan hidup Indonesia. Jakarta: BPS.
Bamberg, M. (2016). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 85–102).
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Derysmono, D., & Al Kahfi. (2025). Islamic environmental ethics and green community practices. Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 14(1), 1–18.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
FAO. (2022). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gemar, A. (2024). Religion and symbolic capital in community-based environmental movements. Aging & Society, 44(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X22001234
Gneezy, U., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2018). A reference-dependent model of charitable giving. Science, 361(6402), 714–717. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5577
IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2019). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahman, K. (2022). Islamic environmental ethics and sustainable development. Islam and Environment, 5(1), 33–49.
Ratnasari, D. (2023). Local culture and green community economy. International Journal of Environmental Education and Research, 9(2), 101–115.
Sihombing, S. O. (2023). Community-based ecotourism and sustainable local economy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(4), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2176543
Smith, J. D. (2024). Religious language and environmental social movements. Global Environmental Politics, 24(1), 112–131.
Syukri, S. (2024). Religious discourse and environmental awareness in local communities. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(2), 145–162.
UNEP. (2020). Global environment outlook 6: Healthy planet, healthy people. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
Zulkifli, N. (2023). Islamic perspectives on environmental responsibility. Al-Araf Journal, 20(1), 1–20.




